
Last weekend, the 6th Annual Gull Lake Invitational Croquet Tournament was played, and for the third time, David Klassen emerged as the victor. I came in as a very close second place, the second time I've come up short at the final stage. This had me thinking: am I the best player to have never won the Nedved Memorial Cup? In golf, soccer or tennis, the easiest way to determine who holds that title (of course, you would be talking about a Grand Slam event, the World Cup or a major, since none of those sports have a competition quite on the scale of the Gull Lake Invitational) is to look at the world rankings. These rankings are determined by assigning point values to results, and totalling them up. Points stay on the record for a certain number of years, and then drop off, allowing new players to climb the rankings, and preventing old players from resting on the laurels of historic victories. I decided that it is high time that the sport of Extreme Croquet adopt a similar system.
Here is the breakdown that I came up with:
- Results affect the ranking for 5 years.
- Points count for their full value for 2 years.
- In the third year, the points begin reducing by 25% each year (based on the original value, so in Year 3, points are worth 75% of their original value, 50% in Year 4, and 25% of their original value in Year 5).
- The only official Extreme Croquet event is the Gull Lake Invitational.
- There are no points for unofficial events.
This system rewards consistency, but also places a high value on recent results. I have devised the system before doing any compiling, so the results will not be twisted in anybody's favour.
Here are the point values (based on those used for the major tournaments of golf):
- 1st: 100 points
- 2nd: 60 points
- 3rd: 40 points
- 4th: 30 points
- 5th: 20 points
- 6th: 15 points
- DNQ: 5 points
This is, I think, an appropriate system. Winning is justifiably worth a lot more points than anything else, third through sixth are not separated by a lot, as qualifying is very difficult, and giving points for a DNQ rewards those who slog it out every year, never giving up or no-showing.
Here are the results that I worked with (for ease of reference, I used people's current names):
2010:
1 - David Klassen
2 - Ian Elford
3 - Rick Greene
4 - Andy Attard
5 - Amy Greene
6 - Jana
DNQ - Nathan Cooke, Boyda Johnstone, Scott Blackburn, Kelsey Everton
2009:
1 - Nathan Cooke
2 - Rick Greene
3 - Andy Attard
4 - Ian Elford
5 - Kelsey Everton
6 - David Klassen
DNQ - Amy Greene, Boyda Johnstone, Jana
2008:
1 - David Klassen
2 - Scott Blackburn
3 - Jana
4 - Jeremy Sergeew
5 - Amy Greene
6 - Rick Greene
DNQ - Lorelei Sergeew, Ian Elford, Kelsey Everton, Nathan Cooke, Boyda Johnstone, Jared McQuaig
2007:
1 - David Klassen
2 - Kelsey Everton
3 - Rick Greene
4 - Ian Elford
5 - Jana
6 - Amy Greene
DNQ - Scott Blackburn, Jared McQuaig, Boyda Johnstone
2006:
1 - Rick Greene
2 - Kelsey Everton
3 - Ian Elford
4 - David Klassen
5 - Boyda Johnstone
6 - Amy Greene
DNQ - Jana, Matt Greene
Thus, here is the current World Ranking:
1 - David Klassen (247.5)
2 - Rick Greene (156.25)
3 - Ian Elford (118.75)
4 - Nathan Cooke (108.75)
5 - Kelsey Everton (73.75)
6 - Andy Attard (70)
7 - Jana (61.25)
8 - Scott Blackburn (52.5)
9 - Amy Greene (51.25)
10 - Jeremy Sergeew (22.5)
11 - Boyda Johnstone (21.25)
12 - Jared McQuaig (6.25)
13 - Lorelei Sergeew (3.75)
14 - Matt Greene (1.25)
My suspicions are confirmed: I am the best player never to have won the Nedved Memorial Cup.
For the sake of curiosity and the official record, I have also compiled what the World Rankings for each of the other years that the sport has been in existence.
Thus, here are the 2005 results that I used:
1 - Rick Greene
2 - Ian Elford
3 - Jeremy Sergeew
4 - David Klassen
5 - Justin Cloutier
6 - Jana
DNQ - Boyda Johnstone, Kelsey Everton, Scott Blackburn, Amy Greene, John Heikel, Laura Platana
Therefore, here were the results going into this most recent tournament (the 2009 Rankings):
1 - David Klassen (210)
2 - Rick Greene (180)
3 - Nathan Cooke (105)
4 - Kelsey Everton (101.25)
5 - Ian Elford (92.5)
6 - Jana (66.25)
7 - Scott Blackburn (65)
8 - Amy Greene (45)
9 - Andy Attard (40)
10 - Jeremy Sergeew (37.5)
11 - Boyda Johnstone (25)
12 - Justin Cloutier (10)
13 - Jared McQuaig (8.75)
14 - Lorelei Sergeew (5)
15 - Matt Greene (2.5)
16 (tie) - Laura Platana (1.25)
16 (tie) - John Heikel (1.25)
So you'll note that Andy moved up from 9 to 6 in this edition and I moved from 5 to 3, while everyone else stayed the same or went down.
2008 Rankings:
1 - David Klassen (237.5)
2 - Rick Greene (180)
3 - Kelsey Everton (112.5)
4 - Ian Elford (95)
5 - Jana (71.25)
6 - Scott Blackburn (67.5)
7 - Jeremy Sergeew (50)
8 - Amy Greene (48.75)
9 - Boyda Johnstone (27.5)
10 (tie) - Justin Cloutier (10)
10 (tie) - Jared McQuaig (10)
12 (tie) - Nathan Cooke (5)
12 (tie) - Lorelei Sergeew (5)
14 - Matt Greene (3.75)
15 (tie) - Laura Platana (2.5)
15 (tie) - Laura Platana (2.5)
Yes, when Nathan Cooke won, he was ranked 12th in the world. That was an epic upset. It moved him up to 3rd in the rankings.
2007 Rankings:
1 - Rick Greene (215)
2 - David Klassen (152.5)
3 - Kelsey Everton (123.75)
4 - Ian Elford (115)
5 - Jana (36.25)
6 - Amy Greene (33.75)
7 - Jeremy Sergeew (30)
8 - Boyda Johnstone (28.75)
9 - Justin Cloutier (15)
10 - Scott Blackburn (8.75)
11 (tie) - Jared McQuaig (5)
11 (tie) - Matt Greene (5)
13 (tie) - Laura Platana (3.75)
13 (tie) - John Heikel (3.75)
This was the era of the Old Firm. Also note that Rick managed to top the rankings despite not winning in 2007, such was his dominance of the early tournaments.
2006 Rankings:
1 - Rick Greene (200)
2 - Ian Elford (100)
3 - Kelsey Everton (65)
4 - David Klassen (60)
5 - Jeremy Sergeew (40)
6 - Boyda Johnstone (25)
7 (tie) - Justin Cloutier (20)
7 (tie) - Jana (20)
7 (tie) - Amy Greene (20)
10 (tie) - Scott Blackburn (5)
10 (tie) - Matt Greene (5)
10 (tie) - Laura Platana (5)
10 (tie) - John Heikel (5)
David was ranked 4th going into his first tournament win.
2005 Rankings:
1 - Rick Greene (100)
2 - Ian Elford (60)
3 - Jeremy Sergeew (40)
4 - David Klassen (30)
5 - Justin Cloutier (20)
6 - Jana (15)
7 (tie) - Kelsey Everton (5)
7 (tie) - Scott Blackburn (5)
7 (tie) - Amy Greene (5)
7 (tie) - Boyda Johnstone (5)
7 (tie) - Laura Platana (5)
7 (tie) - John Heikel (5)
Not much of a base to draw on for the 2005 rankings.
And one final compilation. For each of those who have competed at 2 or more tournaments, I have listed below the highest ranking that they have ever achieved, and the dates for which they held it:
David Klassen - 1 (2008-2010)
Rick Greene - 1 (2005-2007)
Ian Elford - 2 (2005-2006)
Kelsey Everton - 3 (2006-2008)
Nathan Cooke - 3 (2009)
Jeremy Sergeew - 3 (2005)
Jana - 5 (2007-2008)
Andy Attard - 6 (2010)
Scott Blackburn - 6 (2008)
Amy Greene - 6 (2007)
Boyda Johnstone - 6 (2006)
Jared McQuaig - 11 (2007-2008)
There is a lot to digest here. Discuss below (and my apologies to any readers whose minds are numbed by all these statistics that mean nothing to them).
10 comments:
Hahahahaha. I love croquet.
This is EPIC, and an epic development in the world of extreme croquet. Ian, I would like to make a motion that you are the officially Croquet World-Ranking Statistician, which means that every year you provide the Editor of the Gull Lake Gazette with the current World Rankings so that they may be published going into the tournament.
I think it's very important that the points reduce after two years. Because while I'm quite relieved to still be the second best player to never win the Nedved Memorial Cup on the strength of my two second-place finishes, I'll be the first to admit that I have had three not-so-great years in a row, failing to qualify twice times. So unless I pick it up a bit, I'm going to be falling way back in the rankings in the next few years.
Well, now I've got it all in a spreadsheet, so it will be really easy to make every year. In fact, if I bring my laptop along, I'll be able to inform everyone of the changes in the rankings immediately following the tournament.
By the way, if anyone sees any errors, please inform me immediately.
haha this is absolutely ridiculous.
i think everyone would just love it if you brought your laptop.
I did NOT read this all the way through but I found it really funny in the overall current standings - the difference in scores. Matt Greene (I don't even know who you are - my apologies) - is the worst in the WORLD with 1.25 points!!
hilarious
This is awesome, Ian!! I love seeing these stats. Good job on figuring all of this out!! You're a genius!
I'm a little disappointed at my score, though. I feel like I'm a very consistant player (4 of the past 5 years I've either placed 5th or 6th) and therefore somehow feel like I should be ranked above people like Scott and Nathan who have had many DNQ's but have also had one very high second or first place finish. I know that it's because I didn't make the finals in 2009, though. So, I'll just have to keep consistantly making the finals and bring up my ranking in future years!! It gives me something to aim for!
I also feel a bit bad for the people who've only played once...poor Matt and Loralei!Oh well, in a few years, once we've had more time with a consistant group of people, I feel like the ranking will be very accurate!
Oh Michelle, you'll never understand.
Yeah, Amy, that's a tricky one. What makes a person better? Consistently finishing top 5 or 6, or consistently DNQing, but then randomly winning (Nathan)? This sort of a ranking system will always give rise to such debates. The thing is, you know that if you keep doing better than him, in a few years you can pass him again. And really, you are 1.25 points behind Scott, you shouldn't have any trouble passing him.
Ian, I support this motion as well! I think that it's a great addition to the Nedved Memorial Cup! Something else to keep everyone's spirits up, even when they don't win! I know I don't even play in the cup, but I still think that this would be great, for what it's worth!
Yeah, Brittney, that's what I was hoping for: we all have other goals to work towards besides just winning the cup, like Amy now trying to pass Scott in the rankings next year.
David here:
This is, of course, the greatest list of numbers ever compiled. And if I may point out that I remain in good shape to retain the #1 spot even if I cannot make it next year. With the points that I drop Rick would have to place second or first to pass me and Ian could only pass me with a victory. That would merely cement my place as the greatest player to have ever played the game. Then again if Ian won a Rick-Ian final I would drop to third. Maybe i will have to fly back.
My ulterior motive has been revealed: these rankings give David more than just a championship to defend next year, and more motivation to try to come out.
Post a Comment